Anyone here made such a comparison ?, if so. Yesterday I received a Holiday Specials brochure from Music Direct and on the back cover is the 2LP vinyl set that Ralphie discussed in his post HERE. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Even an SACD only disk that’s just a SACD copy of the same CD master is not likely going to deliver a whole lot. (Not Eligible for Additional Discount) $35. A lot of pops and crackles ("a lot" for a brand new MFSL vinyl, I mean) on the. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Sorry about my bad English. DSD recordings have a wonderful sampling rate and are sensationally good. SACD can get really close to how good vinyl can sound but not deteriorate so for me SACD wins. I am intrigued by it but don't know if it would really give me any better quality for some recordings than what I already have. Vinyl. Under perfect circumstances, SACD provides an incremental improvement over CD. KeithH Success With Honor. SACD has no digital filter and relies totally on the analog low pass filter at the output of the DAC. Vinyl: SACD offers digital precision, while vinyl provides analog warmth and character. Noone else has a date. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Perfect music with one of Mozart’s greatest interpreters with the greatest orchestra. This is pure DSD sound to applaud! Axis: Bold As Love, the sensational sophomore release of the Jimi Hendrix Experience, showcased Hendrix's expansive experimentation while acknowledging his early R&B and soul music influences. Mirror Image Forum Resident. All titles are mastered from the original analog tapes by Bernie. Rolling Stone 500 Greatest Albums of All Time — rated 30/500! " Are You Experienced appeared in the U. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. SACD’s technical advantages, high resolution, dynamic range, and low noise. Mirror Image, Sep 16, 2022. 1 2 Page 2 of 2 Parrot Heritage Members 6. I will add this is one album I prefer listening to on CD (the MFSL release) or especially SACD vs vinyl so take my opinion with a grain of salt. New posts Search forums. I much prefer CD to SACD. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Steely Dan's gold-selling fifth studio album The Royal Scam, was produced by Gary Katz and was originally released by ABC Records in 1976. The original purpose was a sonic comparison of MQA to SACD in the physical realm. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Followers 0SACD, DVD-A, vs CD. Maybe but so far my experience with mofi's SACD vs vinyl has not been good for SACS. In my experience, 96/24 is only slightly better than 44/16. SACD. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. It is probably a more accurate rendition of the master tape but with my turntable and on. vinyl superior to both? thats been conjectured. Posted August 3, 2011. I don't know which is more truthful. Both formats have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, so it can be tough to decide which one is right for you. I was a teen in the 60's and don't remember them sounding this bad. This is the SACD that was recommended by Steve and it is the best I've heard so far. SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. SACD players have a 8 to 10 second delay as they switch layers and the mastering can be different on different layers, even on the same hybrid SACD. DVD-Audio vs. Certainly better than 3 or 4 other vinyl versions I have owned over the years. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. #4. Never the SACD player as a SACD player vs a dedicated CD player with the same SACD hybrid disc. Also available on: • UHQR Vinyl Record. #6. Aug 15, 2012. Page 7 of 10 < Prev 1. Every time. Blows them all away with more full body richness. There are more albums where I compared against a standard CD. The 2003 hybrid SACD and the MFSL feature the original mix, but they have inferior sound to the JWH tracks which appear on. The SACD I found is always better, that’s if you have the right SACD player like the DMP. Then I bought the new SACD version. For comparison of the 2022 SACD and vinyl: I have to do it again with all releases. Whereas some others where I am pretty familiar with it's vinyl 'equivalent' I could tell even without direct comparison that the vinyl was better, like Kind of Blue for example. It sounds manipulated and phony. It is a high end format accessible to someone who doesn't want to mess with a protractor, cleaning records or flipping a disc every 20 minutes. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. SACD is a very nice addition if you maintain a decent stationary rig anyway. . Sample Rate: 2. Vinyl has more. Then I bought the new SACD version. Todd68, Jun 30, 2019. Sony SACD. I did the comparison via my Stax Lambda Pro headphone system (which can be quite revealing). An XRCD is just a redbook CD that goes through a special mastering process, usually at 20 or 24 bit, as apposed to a standard redbook CD that is mastered at 16 bits (the XRCD's are converted down to 16 bit at the end of the mastering process in order to retain compatibility with redbook standard). Vinyl. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Some may prefer the analog warmth and tactile nature of vinyl, while others. It was released on two formats: On vinyl record, as an Ultradisc ‘One-Step’ Limited Edition 33⅓ rpm LP, pressed on Neotech’s Super Vinyl™ contained in a commemorative slip box, (and), on CD, as a single Ultradisc 'UHR' Super Audio Compact Disc (SACD) contained in a gatefold card sleeve. Please login or registerlogin or registerThe primary difference noted between the LP and SACD was the increased soundstage and depth of the SACD. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. I wrote I was somewhat pleased with the mastering. 98 $19. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". One is the MFSL version which I loved. If. On the other hand digital has advantages in terms of low noise, low distortion etc so if you value that more, go for the SACD. Posted April 21, 2010. For 11 years, I’ve enjoyed a Puccini + U-clock to spin CDs and (especially) SACDs. The MoFi also has surface noise,while the Abkco vinyl is near silent. Great sounding discs are much, much more frequent than on redbook, and it comes with none of the hassles of vinyl attached, plus you can rip the redbook layer and take it with you. Music shouldn't be encoded at a bitrate lower than 128 kbps, or it will sound pretty lifeless. SACD vs. SACD disc and the DSD encoding (on a SACD) are a "frozen in time" tech circa 2005. Head Gear. It may still. Quick links. Japanese Import. SteelyTom likes this. The SACD format supports multiple audio channels, a very high digital sampling rate, and longer playing time. The only significant differences are in noise. I did a similar shoot out to yours above with the sax and vocal section at the end of Avalon with the SACD and UK first press vinyl. These have to be the quietest set of CDs to be mastered in the “modern era”. At all. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. By AJ Wykes • June 22, 2023 These days the vast majority of the music we experience is stored digitally. sacd superior to rbcd Login / RegisterAllowing for the quality of the youtube audio , that is pretty much what you would expect to hear from those 3 different masters and Its not really fair to say its a CD vs SACD vs Vinyl thing. About 2 years ago, I decided to get back into vinyl. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". The discs are digitally identical and will sound exactly the same no matter what some snake oil lovers will tell you. The band's incendiary…I agree to a point, but "everything matters" and adding an well built, linear power supply to my source made a subtle but very, very noticeable improvement as did cableing, power cables, isolation, etc. . UPC: 093624979340: Availability:. The real difference. The following are not reviews in any way—nothing I say really matters. So - the SACD ain't the original, but it's a much better option than anything on vinyl except the MoFi vinyl issue. #1. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Please login or register an accountlogin or register an accountThere was a comparison of this sacd against a vinyl record (first printing). Pepper hit the charts. • 180 Gram Vinyl Record. Quote: Originally Posted by daltonlanny CD's actually have a better signal to noise ratio in the top octave, and better dynamic range in the upper octave than SACD's do. Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. Vinyl is an analog storage medium, which means there is a physical record of the music imprinted. Thankfully my vinyl copy of that album is pristine. . I sampled a bunch of SACDs and kept finding differences that were attributable to different mastering and. The remastering has added the humanity and warmth Mozart requires. What do you think about SACD vs Vinyl in sound terms? I know it has been deiscussed but if you feel like answer me now after some years after its. It has long been believed that the human ear cannot hear frequencies above 22 kHz. If you like those genres then I can support jumping into SACD's in 2022. Smoother, more open, and slightly fuller than redbook, without the added distortion of vinyl or the oddness in the upper registers heard on SACD. Moody Blues "Question of bal. I don't know which is more truthful. Note the word “indistinguishable. In other forum in Madrid we have carried out the test with the Stereophile material and I'm anxious to know if yo have done the same overhere and what results you have obtained. SACD vs. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Sponsor NewsMini-meet Shootout: AKG K1000 vs. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. " DeTurk is a big advocate. This stereo UHQR reissue will be limited to 30,000 copies, with gold foil individually numbered jackets, housed in a premium slipcase with a wooden dowel spine. I've noticed a surfeit in the cost and availability of SACD's - prices are really cheap for some top notch music, often recorded in Europe with the cost for many disks below $12- with shipping no less! I'm in the process of digitizing my vinyl along with ripping hundreds of CD's to my Mac, but I also like playing. The MoFi absolutely kills the Sony. Boy, what a difference. Vinyl. Fourth - 45 rpm vinyl . 00. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. More sharing options. Also, at the very end of the song, you notice some more dramatic quiet spots on the CD, where the SACD seems to be "filled in" a bit more. 1:55 - Rotel RC-1570 DAC-In questo video. Dynamics are out of this world. But they always compares SACD vs CD on the same player. • 180 Gram Vinyl Record. net (24. 1 kHz setup. More 'holographic', deeper staging. 0:39 - Stereo SACD Layer3. Forums. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. 1 layer is very good, but the SACD layer has smoother high frequencies (violins, oboe) and better transient attack (tympani). Id agree with the guy about the old cd and sacd not being *that* much different other than a bit more resolution. A digital recording doesn't degrade overtime like a record does when played too many times. The standard CD format is a 2-channel, 16-bit, 44. swinger Member Thread Starter. By Paul Sinclair. meatballz. gloomrider, Feb 20, 2014 #177. The fact that the DSD pulse train VISUALLY happens to look more like the analog signal than the string of binary numbers that result from PCM encoding is meaningless - since both must be converted to analog audio anyway. Menu. However, I think it's still too early to answer this question even with identically mastered sources recorded and played back on state-of-the-art equipment optimized for. The MoFi also has surface noise,while the Abkco vinyl is near silent. . Dec 10, 2005. Steely Dan-Cant Buy A Thrill-Hybrid Stereo SACD|Acoustic Sounds. One more thing. Stax, SACD vs. This is why CDs sample sound at 44. Order by Phone Toll Free 1-888-926-2564 Fax 785-825-0156 Phone Outside USA 785-825-8609 Email UsMoody Blues "Question of bal. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. I was still unconvinced. K. The difference between DSD and the source vinyl was very, very slight and I am not sure I could tell the difference on any given day. The gap. Whether is was done 15-20-30 years ago or today. SACD has given me some great listening moments. Page 1. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. New items New comments Author list Series Latest content Latest updates Latest reviews. It. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. They compared the two channel mix. I still prefer vinyl, but I simply do not listen to CD's any more the digital fatigue compared to the SACD's is just too. DSD vs SACD vs Vinyl Whenever I look for an older album or artist, seemingly WITHOUT FAIL they are not available as a DSD download. True. It is a high-resolution digital. If you want to try SACD on a budget (relatively), the Sony UBP-X800M2 Blu-Ray player plays SACDs (as well as DVD Audio, which does high-res surround). Thank you. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. On the vinyl, the violin and the acoustic rhythm guitar lay back a bit, and there's a slightly rounded-off, woody tone to the drumming and the bass, and a very, very subtle tunneled, recessed quality to the vocals. Don't want to spend a lot of money, maybe I will not like them. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Then I bought the new SACD version. Myke, Dec 4, 2013. It sounds great; a very good remastering job. And so on. (Believe it or not, this was a major argument in some of the original SACD sales literature. Many audiophiles choose to embrace both formats, recognizing that each. Often times, the differences can seem quite small upon initial comparison, for example, the Beatles remasters in 24 bit vs. A vinyl record vs a SACD is very very close. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me. The higher the bitrate, the better the sound quality. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. I own this one along with the 1997 re-issue and a 35DP-62 Japan for US. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. I received Hank Mobley, Mobley's Message and also Jackie. . I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Vinyl. I chose Mono because these titles interested me the most. The vocals are real, the acoustic guitars are EQ'd perfectly. If the SACD editions of The Police's albums were mastered from the original first-generation master tapes then they might sound better than the vinyl editions, as the original LPs were more than likely mastered from LP master tapes. The individual versions will be available on September 16, 2022 with the Deluxe version available from October 7, 2022. Details;The 777ES’s performance improved gradually during a burn-in period of three weeks. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Hendersonville, Tennessee Home of Cash & Orbison. But for myself, I think that SACD, when it is really done right (ei: A really good true DSD player, combined with either Pure-DSD recordings, or DSD from pure analog recordings) has many of the. However, we find a significant variation of the levels of the top of the spectrum (above 15 kHz) due to an equalization or to the burning head (red zone). Then I bought the new SACD version. vinyl debate ultimately comes down to personal preference and the listening experience you seek. SACD vs. I only have a single SHM-SACD - it’s superior compared to every format I’ve heard the title on, including the MoFI SACD. Now, don't shoot me, but, I think my CCR SACD's are some of the worst sounding SACD's I have heard. Virtual. In other words it needs some work to breath. I agree with you about surface noise. The yellow arrow indicates the rise in noise above 30 kHz in the SACD due to the DSD64 encoding. culabula, May 3, 2020 #11. By all means, get the 4 DCC's. I’m interested to hear the opinion of those who regularly play LPs as well as their digital front-ends. Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), which format do you prefer and why? wenterprisesnw 02-04-2000 7:53pm. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. 10/disc royalty for CDs. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. I like both; but am buying more hi-q vinyl than SACD, DVD-A, or HDCD simply because remastered 180g vinyl is easier to find in the genres I listen to: Rock, alt. This first example compares MoFi' s Music From Big Pink - LP vs. First, All music is on Vinyl. If you like SACDs, the 2004 reissue of Relaxin’ by the Miles Davis Quintet sounds equally fantastic, albeit a little different with a brighter high end and more noticeable amounts of tape hiss. On the other hand, vinyl’s sound stage remains unbeaten, as the ClearAudio parallel arm. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. . " Arrival Date To Be Announced " for the others. Pour a glass or cup of your preference and press play. I noted underneath your review of the box set that the new SHM-SACD was a flat transfer from the analogue master. Mastered: Doug Sax, James Guthrie, Joel Plante. . This setup would be more flexible and cheaper overall. Most are remasters of jazz, blues, classical or classic rock/pop titles. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I always remember the SACD being pretty good, but I now think the vinyl destroys it. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. The answer to that question is a qualified yes. Voted Vinyl. . Note the. 8224 MHz (64 times that of CD) Bit Depth: 1-bit (compared to CD’s 16-bit) Channels: Multi-channel (up to 6) and stereo Storage Capacity: Typically 4. 49. They are very. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and onl. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. It's very difficult to set up a direct A/B comparison between SACD and CD. SACD's can tend to have better mastering and transfer than standard CD releases of the same album. is the world leader in audiophile music. In. The curve below compares the spectra of vinyl and SACD. Nantes, France. Both sound great but I only want to keep one. We specialize in vinyl records and turntables. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Other than that, the DSD bit stream should be exactly the same for the SACD part. Note the word “indistinguishable. Steely Dan-Cant Buy A Thrill-Hybrid Stereo SACD|Acoustic Sounds. I own the SHM-CDs of all the early Steely Dan albums ( Can't Buy A Trill through Gaucho) and I'm more than pleased with the fidelity of these issues. Be fun to have that and play mastering engineer. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. Also, instead of a 16-bit depth, it uses a 1-bit depth. I, obviously, played the vinyl on my Clearaudio Concept TT. I see a trend, and I tend to do this myself, looking for older "original" cd releases of stuff if there are one or multiple re-masters available today. Thread starter mosttoysrk; Start date Sep 25, 2007; Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:. Vinyl. Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce. 8224 MHz. After purchasing The Cars S/T, Candy-O, and Shake It Up on MFSL vinyl, here are my thoughts. So - the SACD ain't the original, but it's a much better option than anything on vinyl except the MoFi vinyl issue. Sign in with Google Even the standard redbook CD (44kHz, 16 bit resolution) has about a 26dB advantage to vinyl with respect to dynamic range, and at least a 40-50 dB advantage in stereo separation as well as unmeasurable wow and flutter. 10/disc royalty for CDs. Also, I know that SACD didn't really catch on, but I see. Hi commsysman. The SHM-SACD is still a good option because it doesn't have CSG processing. I just don't have many detailed DVD-Audio discs. The ABCX-758A/B as mentioned above is my favorite. That depends on what you are looking for. The real difference between various releases is the quality of the mastering. Then the sleeves and inner sleeves. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. SACD vs. but for every song, the DR value is "one less" on the SACD vs CD. Singles 1969-1973 has a re-record or two, a little remixing, and other touches. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Technically, it's more an aesthetic choice or trying to be louder than the other band on the street. Add to Cart. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. They also don’t degrade with each playback, unlike analog records. So far I had different results. Vinyl, ASL AQ-1005 DT vs. SHM-SACD vs original CD (WB), vs original vinyl (WB) I first cleaned each vinyl LP on my NG 1. SHM-SACD vs Original LP/Original LP-rip, Original CD and other reissues. Every time. No change in data , no change in sound , simple as that. I've heard people say that this album isn't recorded as well as the albums to come, and to that I disagree. The best of both worlds is vinyl ripped on a very high end rig in High res and then converted to DSD. 99. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. By meatballz August 2, 2011 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. But I don't like surface noise or pops or skips. All that being written, the dilemma, SACD vs. Truth is, there aren't really any bad sounding versions of this moody gem since the first pressing back in spring 1971. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. Hybrid Stereo SACD. It is now showing as ‘in stock’ on the Acoustic Sounds. Music41 said: ↑. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. OTOH, there are many recordings from the 60s, 70s, and 80s that are of poor sound quality. SACD (1999) uses completely different 1-Bit method of encoding so it is hard to extrapolate, but best guess, SACD is about. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. Then I bought the new SACD version. the HDCD, the single-layer SACD, the MFSL SACD and vinyl, the Audio Fidelity vinyl, and the RSD candy-colored 150-numbered-limited pressing. SACD vs. 7 gigabytes per disk (as much as a DVD), SACD can accommodate separate stereo and six-channel mixes of 100 minutes each. This album can sound really good. Nowadays I listen to vinyl. SACD vs. The better sounding recordings any given record company are the one's chosen for SACD release. This is especially appealing for home theater enthusiasts. 1 kHz sampling rate, SACD samples at 2. disc duplication: The Indie Music Minute. But I do own the original US CD and '93 remaster, along with the vinyl which is a skip-fest sadly. : AREP 517787. With a storage capacity of 4. I voted 'Who Cares. CD. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Usually, more attention was paid to the mastering of 50s and 60s LPs and currently, SACDs. Multi. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. . deeper, wider sound field. I do have an unwrapped Cramberries (best of) SHM CD with me. Similar to what I notice. Los Angeles, CA. . Check the numbers; audiophiles have voted decisively with their wallets for vinyl. This first example compares MoFi' s Music From Big Pink - LP vs. The separation between the left and right channels on vinyl is 30dB, compared to digital files, which exceed 90 dB. Just for kicks I decided to compare Side A of the Speakers Corner vinyl to the same corresponding songs on the JSACD. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. #4. " Arrival Date To Be Announced " for the others. The "Mastertape" version though more detailed and seemingly purer sounds flatter in eq. I had some old albums I wanted to play, so I blew the dust off my 35 year old TT and fired that mut. ? I jumped into the SACD thing because I wanted agood digital source for my CDs so I said why not pay some more and get SACD. ) Reel-to-reel can be better, but tapes are fragile and rare, then the players have been out of production for decades and require expensive maintenance from. Hi all, Im searching for some way to test SACD compared to vinyl. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's.